Bulletin #22 |
June
22, 2007 |
Budget
negotiations intensify -- municipal revenue at risk
A
Senate proposal to provide relief for the counties’ share of
Medicaid costs would, in its present form, cost cities and towns future
revenue. The Senate Finance Committee discussed, but did not vote
on, SB 1484 – Medicaid Sales Tax Swap this week and is expected
to discuss the proposal again at 6 p.m. on Monday. This is a complicated
bill and the situation is fluid and subject to change, but in its
present form, the bill takes part of the sales tax proceeds going
to municipalities and replaces them with a flat reimbursement.
We support the efforts of the counties for Medicaid relief but not
at the expense of municipal revenues.
Full information on the effects of SB 1484 on municipalities is not
yet available. The bill as written would take five-eighths of one
cent of local option sales taxes (one half cent of Article 44 tax
and one-eighth cent of Article 40 tax) and make these state sales
taxes. In turn, the state would take over the county’s share
of Medicaid expenses. Counties could levy a new one-half cent local
option tax, but the proceeds would not be shared with municipalities.
Municipalities would receive a “hold harmless” payment
equal to their share of the five-eighths cent in taxes that the state
would be taking over, but the amount would be frozen with no growth
factor. Our first analysis of SB 1484, based on this limited information,
is that cities and towns would lose a minimum of $115.2 million in
growth over the first five years.
A plan that takes away a growing municipal revenue source and replaces
it with a flat reimbursement is a major concern for us. Losing growth
means losing ground. And we know firsthand about the insecurity of
reimbursements, having lost $130 million in municipal revenues in
FY2001-02 when the state had a budget gap.
The House has its own version of a Medicaid relief plan, but details
about this plan are somewhat sketchy. We understand that it would
involve authorization for counties to increase the sales tax or impose
a real estate transfer tax, subject to a referendum. We expect this
issue to be decided in the next few weeks.
Please immediately deliver a simple message to your senators –
and then to your representatives: We support a reasonable Medicaid
relief plan for the counties, but not at the expense of essential
municipal revenue sources.
Keep up the contacts on No Competition bill
Please keep up the good work in opposition to the “No
Competition Bill,” also known as HB 1587 – Local Government
Fair Competition Act.
We have been joined in our cause by some key network and internet
technology companies. Google, Intel, Alcatel-Lucent, and Tropos Networks
have all lent their voices to the growing opposition. The bill would
sharply limit local governments' ability to create their own telecommunications
networks and would prevent them from partnering with private telecom
providers to establish broadband service.
The bill is heavily backed by the telecommunications industry and
is intended to discourage competition from local government in the
provision of communications services. However, it is clear that the
industry does not intend to provide service in certain areas and will
not commit to serve entire communities. Local governments should have
the ability to provide citizens with access to high-speed broadband
service for the future economic development of our state. Rural and
distressed urban areas should not be left behind.
Please let us know if we may include your municipality on a list in
opposition to this bill to be presented to members of the House. Contact
Anita Watkins at awatkins@nclm.org.
Renewable energy discussed
A committee substitute for SB 3 - Promote Renewable Energy/Energy
Efficiency was unveiled in the Senate Agriculture and Environment
Committee this week, following a lengthy stakeholders’ process.
The bill would subject electric power suppliers to a renewable energy
and energy efficiency portfolio standard. Under the proposal, suppliers
renewable fuels and energy efficiency efforts would have to comprise
12.5 percent of energy portfolios by 2021. No vote was taken, but
the bill is scheduled in the committee on Tuesday of next week.
Steep slope construction bill heard
A committee substitute for HB 1756 – Safe Artificial
Slope Construction Act was discussed in House Environment this week
but no action was taken. As revised, the bill would affect nineteen
counties in the western part of state. Those counties would be required
to adopt ordinances to regulate site planning, design, and construction
of artificial slopes in mountainous areas. Artificial slope construction
is defined as any land-disturbing activity that creates or changes
any slope, or attempts to do so. County ordinances would apply in
both unincorporated and incorporated areas, unless a city chose to
adopt its own ordinance to apply within city limits and the extraterritorial
jurisdiction. (Many already have regulations in place.) Discussion
is expected to continue in committee next week.
Homestead increase advances
The House unanimously passed a bill Wednesday that increases
the income threshold for individuals to qualify for the property tax
homestead exclusion from $19,000 to $25,000. The increase would be
effective July 1, 2009. HB 1499 – Increase Homestead Income
Limit to $25,000 does not change the amount of the exclusion itself.
Following are some of the bills that were introduced or acted upon
this week. If you need a copy of these or any other bills, please
contact the Legislative Printed Bills Office at 919-733-5648 or the
League office. Remember that bills and legislative calendars are now
available on the Internet at http://www.ncleg.net. Please contact
the League staff if you have any particular interest or concern regarding
any piece of legislation.
General Government
Bill: HB 24 – SMOKING IN STATE GOVT. BUILDINGS/PROHIBITION
Sponsors: Weiss (D35); Glazier (D45)
Status: Senate Calendar for 6/26
Allows local governments to restrict smoking in buildings and in public
transportation vehicles owned or leased by the local government.
Bill: HB 1340 - AMATEUR RADIO ANTENNAS
Sponsors: McComas (R19)
Status: Passed Senate
Requires city and county ordinances to reasonably accommodate amateur
radio communications antennas and structures and be the minimum practicable
regulation necessary to accomplish the purpose of the ordinance. Prohibits
cities and counties from restricting antennas or antenna support structures
of amateur radio operators to heights of 90 feet or lower unless the
restriction is necessary to achieve a clearly defined health, safety,
or aesthetic objective.
Local Bills
Bill: HB 925 - GRANITE QUARRY-FAITH POLICE AUTHORITY
Sponsors: Steen (R76)
Status: SL 2007-88
Authorizes the two towns to establish a joint policy authority.
Bill: HB 1141 - GRANITE QUARRY/FORM OF GOVERNMENT
Sponsors: Steen (R76)
Status: SL 2007-89
Amends the town’s charter to allow it to operate under the council-manager
form of government.
Bill: SB 350 - WAKE CO. TOWNS ELECTRONIC NOTICES
Sponsors: Stevens (R17)
Status: SL 2007-86
Authorizes Apex, Garner and Knightdale to adopt ordinances providing
that notice of public hearings may be given through electronic means,
including, but not limited to, the towns’ internet sites. Such
ordinances do not supersede any state law that requires notice by
mail to certain classes of people or the posting of signs on certain
property and does not alter the publication schedule for any public
notice.
Public Safety
Bill: SB 34 - KILL POLICE ANIMAL
Sponsors: Swindell (D11)
Status: SL 2007-80
Makes it a Class H felony to willfully kill or attempt to kill a law
enforcement or assistance animal and makes it an aggravating circumstance
for other criminal offenses that such an animal was seriously harmed
or killed while engaged in performing official duties.
Transportation
Bill: SB 1453 - OYSTER SHELLS/HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION
Sponsors: Jenkins (D3)
Status: SL 2007-84
Prohibits DOT or any other unit of government from using oyster shells
as a ground cover in a highway beautification project. Requires these
entities that come into possession of oyster shells to make them available
to the Division of Marine Fisheries for use in any oyster bed revitalization
programs or any other program that may use the shells.
S. Ellis Hankins, Executive Director |
Andrew L. Romanet, Jr., General Counsel |
|